Resources
News and Events
Filter By:

2026 Best Lawyers
We are proud to honor ten of our attorneys who have been named to the 2026 Best Lawyers in America List.

RYP’s Michael Lewis was featured by New Hampshire Public Radio, for his analysis of evidence of public corruption in New Hampshire’s corrections facilities.
Michael Lewis, senior litigator at Rath Young and Pignatelli, was featured by New Hampshire Public Radio, for his analysis of evidence of public corruption in

MBA’s 2025 Health Law Conference October 9, 2025
Rath Young and Pignatelli’s Judith Albright, Chair of the Mass. Bar Association Health Law Section, announces the MBA’s 2025 Health Law Conference October 9, 2025,

How Community Power Is Transforming the New Hampshire Energy Landscape, One Year Later
In a recent article published in the New Hampshire Bar News, attorneys Katherine Hedges and Lauren Kilmister discuss the continued growing presence of Community Power programs in New Hampshire. Their article is a follow-up of their previous article in the New Hampshire Bar News, and highlights how Community Power programs have begun to deliver electricity to New Hampshire households, generally at lower costs and with a higher renewable generation mix.

Rath, Young and Pignatelli Obtains Landmark Free Speech & Press Ruling from NH Supreme Court in Richards v. Azzi
Attorney Michael S. Lewis obtained a landmark ruling from the NH Supreme Court bolstering free speech and free press rights, today, in the matter of Richards v. Azzi. Representing Robert Azzi, an award-winning columnist, as part of the firm’s pro bono practice, Lewis obtained a ruling from the NH Supreme Court protecting Azzi from liability for the content of an opinion column he published in the New Hampshire Union Leader. In the same decision, the Court resolved the open question of whether New Hampshire recognizes an independent cause of action known as “False Light – Invasion of Privacy” in Azzi’s favor. Grounding its decision in scholarship Azzi brought before the Court in his briefing, the Court declined to expand the risks of engaging in free speech and press by recognizing a new cause of action that threatens those interests. Generally, the decision strengthens protections for public commentary that are long recognized in New Hampshire and ensure. These protections, in turn, that New Hampshire will remain a forum for robust public debate, consistent with its standing as a jurisdiction whose citizens embrace and welcome such debate as part of their First-in-the-Nation political identity.
